Happy holidays

Happy holidays, everyone. Enjoy the company of the people around you, and remember those who are not as fortunate. ‘Tis the season for giving.
(oh, and as a good friend always tells me: “good things come to those who wait.”
)

Happy holidays, everyone. Enjoy the company of the people around you, and remember those who are not as fortunate. ‘Tis the season for giving.
(oh, and as a good friend always tells me: “good things come to those who wait.”
)
OK, right off, let’s get something straight: there’s a lot I don’t like about Bush/Cheney.
To support my point, I’ll provide an easy-to-understand (however most likely incomplete) list.
Wish it would’ve turned out differently, but it’s done. A high voter turnout (yay!) has shown what the people of America want. Maybe my frustration is that I still don’t know any good reasons why anyone voted for Bush; I can understand voting Republican, but to support the man?
All of that said, it is important for the supporters of both sides to come together. I will always disagree with some policies (I would disagree with some Kerry policies, too), and I will make my voice heard. I encourage everyone else to do so. Partisan bickering, complaining, and gloating, though, will polarize the country more than ever. Our country’s representation this year is more conservative than the last. Though I don’t agree, I pledge to do all I can to find common ground.
Remember the couple of months after September 11, 2001? It was a time when the country was united. Everyone helped each other. We were all part of one country. I want that to happen again; let’s start now.
“I’m a comedian who makes fun of what I believe to be the absurdities of our government… make my life difficult. Make this next four years really shit for me. So that every morning all we can do is come in and go, ‘Uhh, Madonna’s doing some Kabbalah thing, you wanna do that?’ I’d like that. I’m tired.” – Jon Stewart
It’s really funny how things happen.
Apparently Rock the Vote started a campaign e-mailing mock draft notices to members. Apparently the Republican National Committee didn’t really like this. Ed Gillespie, the chairman of the RNC, noted that he believed the “misinformation campaign” was “being conducting [sic] with malacious intent and reckless disregard for the truth.” His basis for this statement? Bush and Rumsfeld said that we won’t have a draft. (For the record, Kerry said the same thing.) Gillespie ordered RtV to cease and desist with the campaign or else face legal action.
Hmm, that’s interesting. I’d say the possibility’s still there, seeing as how I had to register for the thing and they say on their site that they’ll “maintain its readiness as required by law.”
Jehmu S. Greene, the president of Rock the Vote, didn’t like that as much as Gillespie didn’t like the first thing. In a response, Greene asserted that the organization had a right to publicize the possibility of a draft and marked Gillespie’s comments as “attempted censorship.”
My opinion? The draft issue will get young people (yes, men and women, seeing as how the latest draft legislation isn’t gender-biased) to vote, and it’s an issue concerning them. Rock the Vote had the right to do it. I think they might have been a bit too forward, from what I’ve heard, but they have the right – just like the RNC has the right to misleadingly characterize Kerry as a flip-flopper. It just scares me that either party would attack an organization whose sole purpose is to get people to vote over something like this.
Lots of good stuff over this at the Democracy Now! site. I’m really disappointed at how dirty this campaign has become for both sides – and it still bothers me that no matter how hard I try, no matter who tries to convince me, I can’t come up with a single reason why I’d vote for Bush. Must we resort to this sort of childish bickering on an issue this important? I really hope not, but I fear it’s already happened. Things like this really make me want to get into politics.
(An interesting aside: the RNC letter was cc’d to a few organizations, including Vince McMahon of WWE [that made me chuckle] and bigwigs at MTV, AOL, Time Warner, and NBC. The Rock the Vote letter? NBC, MTV, AOL, Time Warner… Jay, Conan, and David… and Jon.)
Though I accused him of being biased in my last post, at least he admits it – on national television, no less. Check these out.
Jon Stewart on Crossfire (or here)
Jon Stewart on the Daily Show talking about Crossfire
“They said that I wasn’t being funny… and I said to them, ‘I know that, but tomorrow I will go back to being funny and your show will still blow.’”
In my Introduction to Mass Communication class last year, Professor Laura Lindenfeld told us that there is no such thing as an unbiased source. Since news is reported by people, she explained, news will have a slant due to each reporter’s individual opinion.
Unfortunately, I’m finding that this trait of news is emerging at a most inconvenient time. It seems as though there have been many occasions at which I have found myself literally swearing at media outlets for a variety of reasons: slanted “factual” stories, unfair reporting, or, what’s worst, completely falsified reports. To illustrate:
Has all of top-level journalism gone back to high school? This isn’t what you should be doing, folks.
In my opinion, this is where the Internet could really shine. Is it possible to have a close-to-unbiased source for news? From a technical standpoint, yes. There are some politically-driven sites out there that work very well – take MoveOn.org (yuck) and Daily Kos, for example – but the ones I’ve found have all taken one side or the other. Why can’t there be one single source where people from both sides healthily debate the issues and try to disprove what the other side says? There have been so many misleading statements this year from both camps that the sheer number of people researching on the Internet could definitely debunk everything. There should be a site somewhere that takes every word from the debate – or from every article published on major news sites – and tries to assure that the reporting is given in a correct context. If anyone knows of a site, please let me know: justin@justinrussell.com.
I’ll be going through a lot of changes soon, and I’m reconsidering what’s important to me (of which this issue is one) and where I want to spend my time. Soon I’ll be launching a new package that will replace my current blog, and I’ll also be working on other projects that will comprehensively rework my most major sites. It’s time for me to step up. And please don’t forget to do your part to make the world better, too.
Who would’ve thought that the more concerts you shoot (Rockapella, Rick Charette, Bumstock, Guster, ZOX, etc.), the better you get?
[pictures of Vague Valentine, Headstart, and As Fast As last night at Rock Against Rape]
Tonight’s music pick: “In the Waiting Line” from Simple Things by Zero 7.
(Thank Garden State for this one; it provided the background to an amazingly well-shot ecstacy party scene.)

As promised, I attended the Edwards rally today on the Mall in front of the library. It was very well attended, and I was able to see a lot of my friends there (nice to have Democratic friends, I guess). Introduced by Stephen King and Maine governor John Baldacci, he spoke surprisingly well and seemed to hit most of the talking points raised throughout the campaign. You can read about it on some of the major news outlets.
But…

…that’s the problem.
As someone interested in photography, media, and possibly some form of journalism, I looked over what will probably be the event with the widest coverage at the University for a while.
My first stop was at a USA Today [AP] article detailing the event. First of all, that picture isn’t from UMaine. Edwards took off his coat the minute he stepped on stage. Second, though the video is supposedly focusing on Edwards’s talk at the University, it includes no actual coverage from here. Third, it wasn’t a completely student audience. In fact, many faculty and community members from around Maine attended the event.
The Miami Herald’s take on the AP story fared a bit better. It seemed to include more accurate coverage of the speech’s content, especially with details like Edwards’s “the Bush administration is the first in 75 years to post a net loss of jobs.” It also accurately noted the (small) group of Bush supporters in the back of the crowd. It did not mention, however, the one student who walked through the audience holding his flip-flops in the air while slapping them together.
Those seem to be the two AP articles circulating right now. I can only hope that in time photos will find their way to the stream (as well as video).
Call it action/reaction.
This evening John Edwards (“our next vice president”, if I listen to the Democrats driving around campus with a car and a loudspeaker) will be speaking/rallying/propagandizing near the Library at UMaine. I’m headed there to see it – just like I would for any semi-major political figure – and hopefully get some pictures, unless the confiscate my camera. Apparently people have already been around with chalk (on both sides, I’ve heard)… and apparently facilities has already been around with a pressure-washer.
Afterwards, I’ll be headed to the Maine Center for the Arts to see the Capitol Steps mock everything I just heard near the Library. Hopefully they’ll do some of my favorites along with some new tunes fresh for the election year.
This should be an interesting evening. I wonder if the Steps know that Edwards is around. That could be fun.