There’s been some press lately about Harvard president Lawrence H. Summers saying something about how women may inherently be worse in math and science because they lack natural ability (full disclosure: if I recall correctly, I have some obscure personal connection to Summers). Now, I make a lot of jabs at Harvard, partially for fun and partially because after four years I still question the value of going to a private university over a public school, but I want to point out a few things about the AP article that’s being spread (keep in mind that I was not in attendance at the speech, nor do I know any possible history of Summers and gender issues). First, the article contains no direct quotes from Summers’s speech. Second, from my experience, any criticism at all about a sensitive issue such as gender, race, politics, religion, or *gasp* abortion will cause people to become uncomfortable.
As another point, I’d like to point out a few sex role socialization notes from my Childhood Psychology class last semester. Keep in mind that this course was taught by a female professor:
- Males’ brains are bigger (females have brains that are 11% smaller)
- Females’ brains are better organized
- Females have more gray matter (information processing)
- Males have more white matter (brain-body impulses)
- Corpus callosum is much thicker in females (intra-hemisphere communication)
- Stronger inter-hemisphere communication contributes to better verbal skills
- Hemisphere distinctiveness in males allows better spatial skills
While it may be disputed by some, there’s scientific research behind this. Would there have been as much of a problem if he had said males lack natural ability for communication? And wouldn’t his statements mean, in essence, that women studying math and science at an esteemed institution such as Harvard would have achieved a higher level of thinking than the males there?
I just want to make sure that the issue isn’t being shown as a completely opinion-based remark without realizing that there is in fact some biological evidence that supports that it may be the case.
(There’s a through Slashdot discussion going on about the issue, and Harvard’s Crimson campus newspaper has an article about it.)